Help Me Understand The Courts !!!

PLEASE HELP ME !!! I do not understand the decisions of the Supreme Court of The USA and other courts.

First a “right to privacy” exists to allow a woman to have someone murder her unborn child---Although not such “right” is noted in the Constitution of the USA or in the writings of the founders of this nation and the authors of that Constitution and its Bill-of-Rights. But, no such right to privacy appears to prevent the FBI from making searches, without a judge's approved and issued warrant, even though the Constitution calls for such warrants and the writings of our Founding Fathers are full of concerns about that subject.

The Court(s) have supported something called “the separation of church and state” (Based on a private letter of Thomas Jefferson and ignoring the fact that the “non-establishment clause” was originally included in the Bill-Of-Rights to protect those states (ex-colonies) who had an established church from some over-powering, national, church as had England). Those same courts ignore the neighboring “free exercise of religion” and “free speech” provisions and will not protect groups of citizens who wish to exercise those rights by their erecting or placing religious statements (eg The Ten Commandments) in public places or on civic coats-of-arms without making them meaningless, as free speech and free exercise of religious expression, by drowning them in a sea of secular symbols. (The courts appear to be using such rulings in making Atheism or “Secular Humanism” the “Established Church Of The United States Of America”)

“Freedom Of Speech” was well established in our Constitution and Laws until the Supreme Court declared, in supporting the McCain-Feingold law, that it may be severely limited for certain periods before elections---When, such speech is most necessary and should be as free as is possible.

“Freedom Of The Press” is strongly protected in our Constitution and Laws---Unless the reporter is a student at a public school.

Protection against racial and other “class-based” discrimination is illegal---Unless the victim is Male or White/Oriental.

Even in Wisconsin, its Supreme Court took a very clear Constitutional Amendment (Section-1, Article-25), as approved by the People and with very clear language as to the People's right to keep and bear arms and subjected it to the type of “up is down, black is white, war is peace, good is evil” analysis as found in the novel 1984 and, by such judicial tyranny, destroyed the intent of the People.

Can anyone explain these contradictions to me?

HELP !!!